Tax Information Exchange Agreements-Part1
Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information
The jurisdictions that have made commitments to transparency and efective exchange of information, both OECD and non‐OECD jurisdictions, have worked together in the Global Forum on Taxation to develop the international standards for transparency and efective exchange of information in tax maters. A major achievement of this collaboration is the development of the 2002 Model Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Maters. This model has been used as the basis for negotiations of more than 70 Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAs).
To help achieve a level playing feld, jurisdictions were encouraged to fully implement the principles of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. Further, they were asked to review their policies in relation to specifc areas and report the outcome of their reviews at the next meeting of the Global Forum. Jurisdictions were also encouraged to negotiate agreements allowing for the exchange of information on tax maters.
Standards of Transparency and Exchange of Information
The OECD’s Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information has developed standards of transparency and exchange of information that were adopted by the G20 Ministers of Finance at the meeting in Berlin in 2004 and by the UN Commitee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Maters in October 2008. They serve as a model for the vast majority of the 3600 bilateral tax conventions entered into by OECD and non OECD countries and may now be considered as the international norm for tax cooperation.
OECD Member CountriesTwenty countries originally signed the Convention on the Organisation for Economic Coorporation and Development on 14 December 1960. Since then a further ten countries have become members of the Organisation. The Member countries of the Organisation and the dates on which they deposited their instruments of ratifcation are: |
|
| Australia | 7th June 1971 |
| Austria | 29th September 1961 |
| Belgium | 13th September 1961 |
| Canada | 10th April 1961 |
| Czech Republic | 21st December 1995 |
| Denmark | 30th May 1961 |
| Finland | 28th January 1969 |
| France | 7th August 1961 |
| Germany |
27th September 1961 |
| Greece | 27th September 1961 |
| Hungary | 7th May 1996 |
| celand | I 5th June 1961 |
| Ireland | 17th August 1961 |
| Italy | 29th March 1962 |
| Japan | 28th April 1964 |
| Korea | 12th December 1996 |
| Luxembourg | 7th December 1961 |
| Mexico | 18th May 1994 |
| Netherlands | 13th November 1961 |
| New Zealand | 29th May 1973 |
| Norway | 4th July 1961 |
| Poland | 22nd November 1996 |
| Portugal | 4th August 1961 |
| Slovak Republic | 14th December 2000 |
| Spain | 3rd August 1961 |
| Sweden | 28th September 1961 |
| Switzerland | 28th September 1961 |
| Turkey | 2nd August 1961 |
| United Kingdom | 2nd May 1961 |
| United States | 12th April 1961 |
Standards of Transparency and Exchange of Information
- Exchange of information on request where it is “foreseeable relevant” to the administration and enforcement of the domestic laws of the treaty partner
- No restrictions on exchange caused by bank secrecy or domestic tax interest requirements
- Availability of reliable information and powers to obtain it
- Respect for taxpayers’ rights
- Strict confdentiality of information exchanged
Access to Bank Information for Tax Purposes
In parallel with the work on harmful tax practices, the OECD is examining the extent to which OECD member countries and observer countries have access to bank information for tax purposes. In 2000, Improving Access to Bank Information for Tax Purposes was published. The report set out an ideal standard of access to bank information, namely, that “all Member countries should permit access to bank information, directly or indirectly, for all tax purposes so that tax authorities can fully discharge their revenue raising responsibilities and engage in efective exchange of information with their treaty partners”. The OECD has been closely monitoring the progress made in implementing this standard and has issued two progress reports, in 2003 and 2007. With the recent announcements by Austria, Belgium, Luxembourg and Switzerland, all OECD countries now endorse this standard.
Tax Havens.....
In a report issued in 2000, the OECD identifed a number of jurisdictions which it categorised as tax havens according to criteria it had established. 6 of them (Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Cyprus, Malta, San Marino, The Bahamas) made pre‐commitments to the standard and so were not included in the list. Between 2000 and 2002 the OECD worked with these jurisdictions to secure their commitment to implement the OECD’s standards of transparency and exchange of information. In all, 38 jurisdictions made formal commitments to implement these principles, including a number of jurisdictions that had already commited to these standards prior to the issuance of the report.
Key Factors to term a jurisdiction as a ‘Tax Haven’: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct-Dec 2011
Doing Business Updates
Archives
Jan-March 2010
Jul-Sept 2010
April-June 2009



